Due Process vs Crime Control Essay

AbstractAlthough plague check and ascribable wreak have whatever similarities, there atomic number 18 more contrasts surrounded by the two. horror discipline emphasizes execration prevention, whereas payable adjoin emphasizes the shelterion of citizens rightlys from mistakes do by wretched jurist agencies. The respectable dimensions of trace issues confronting the bend justice dodging and private certificate concerning to collectable answer and iniquity adjudge ar citizens rights, proper judicial representation, as hale as physical force, when to engage sulfurous force, and deceptions. The private security industry too faces key ethical issues regarding the lack of genteelness, in addition to violations of rules and regulations.Due Process or iniquity program lineThe ethical utmost of key issues confronting the outlaw justice arranging and private security regarding due exploit and crime control be many, much(prenominal) as not knowing what the right course of action is, difficulty doing what is considered right, or simply finding the wrong plectrum to be very tempting. Due serve easy is a citizens right to proper legal representation, procedures, and justice of individuals, which decreases the power of government. The main purpose of due process is to protect individuals from mistakes do by law enforcement agents and prosecutors.In contrast, crime control increases the power of the government in order to protect society, which diminishes an individual citizens rights (US profound, Inc., 2001-2008). The main goal of crime control is crime suppression, which includes key issues of physical force, when to use deadly force, undercover work, deceptions, as salubrious as many others in the evil justice system. In the private security field, the key issues include the lack of training and violations of rules and regulations of the industry (Gould, 2008).Due Process tally to Packers due process pretense, which consists of the following points of view, emphasizes the contrasts with the crime control model (Cliffnotes.com). 1. The most important function of criminal justice should be to provide due process or fundamental pallidity under the law. 2. Criminal justice should concentrate on defendants rights, not victims rights, because the Bill of Rights expressly provides for the protection of defendants rights. 3. constabulary powers should be curb to prevent official oppression of the individual. 4. fundamental rights are not mere technicalities criminal justice authorities should be held accountable to rules, procedures, and guidelines to ensure fairness and consistency in the justice process. 5. The criminal justice process should look deal an obstacle course, consisting of a series of impediments that take the form of adjectival safeguards that serve as much to protect the factually innocent as to bunco the factually guilt feelingsy. 6. The government should not reconcile a somebody guilt y alone on the basis of the facts a person should be found guilty tho if the government follows legal procedures in its fact-finding.Crime ControlThe following contentions are the key concerns of the crime control, which points out the differences of due process. (Cliffnotes.com). 1. The repression of crime should be the most important function of criminal justice because order is a necessary condition for a broad society. 2. Criminal justice should concentrate on vindicating victims rights rather than on protecting defendants rights. 3. Police powers should be expanded to make it easier to investigate, arrest, search, seize, and convict. 4. Legal technicalities that handcuff the police should be eliminated. 5. The criminal justice process should operate like an assembly-line conveyor belt, moving cases swiftly along toward their disposition. 6. If the police make an arrest and a prosecutor files criminal charges, the accused should be presumed guilty because the fact-finding of police and prosecutors is super reliable. 7. The main objective of the criminal justice process should be to discover the right or to establish the factual guilt of the accused.Similarities betwixt Due Process and Crime ControlAlthough the differences are many and well emphasized, there are a fewer similarities between due process and crime control. Both uphold laws and regulations that have been completed throughout the many years of this country. The similarities are1.Accept constitutional values2.Hold to ex spotlight facto prohibition3.Duty to enforce laws where violations have occurred certaintyDue process and crime control propose to serve similar objectives, which are to reduce crime and protect the citizens of the united States. The ethical key issues that plague the due process and crime control models set off among the two, in how to deal with the many issues and the beaver way to deal with the issues are conflicting. The differences between the two on how to reach these objectives are many, yet the few similarities assist in keeping both processes abide by the laws established by the government of the fall in States.ReferencesUSLegal, Inc. (2001-2008). US Legal Definitions. Retrieved on January 5, 2010 from http//definitions.uslegal.com/c/crime-control-model/ Gould, M. (2008). Business, Ethics & Society, (p. 1). Great Neck Publishing. Retrieved January 4, 2010, from look Starters Business database. CliffsNotes.com. (n.d.). Which Model? Crime Control or Due Process. Retrieved on January 4, 2010, from http//www.cliffsnotes.com/WileyCDA/CliffsReviewTopic/topicArticleId-10065,articleId-9911.html